Improve clarity and analogies in “Render and Commit” guide #7878
Conversation
…r better understanding of React's rendering cycle
|
Hi @gov5033! Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. Action RequiredIn order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks! |
|
This is AI and the result is really bad and breaks the page, please don't run AI on the docs and submit PRs like this. |
2 participants
This PR enhances the “Render and Commit” documentation by:
Refining analogies (e.g., React as a waiter, components as cooks) to make rendering concepts more intuitive
Rephrasing key sentences for better readability and flow
Improving structure to clearly separate initial render, re-renders, and commit phases
Adding helpful inline explanations and best practices (e.g., pure rendering, performance tips)
These changes aim to make the guide easier for beginners to grasp and more valuable for advanced users who want to solidify their mental model of React's lifecycle.